In the pursuit of optimal health and well-being, informed consent stands as a fundamental principle that underpins medical ethics and patient rights. The concept is simple: before making decisions about their health, individuals have the right to be fully informed about the potential risks and benefits of their choices. However, in our current Western allopathic medical system, there’s a growing concern that informed consent is often incomplete, overshadowed by the fear that patients might make “wrong” choices or become discouraged.
As a pharmacist and clinical herbalist who deeply values natural health solutions, I have witnessed firsthand the dilemmas faced by healthcare professionals when it comes to providing comprehensive information to patients. The desire to ensure compliance with prescription medications sometimes overshadows the responsibility to educate patients about the potential risks associated with these treatments. It’s a fine line to walk, and this dilemma reflects a systemic issue within our healthcare framework.
One of the core problems is the lack of sufficient data to support the validity of our current treatment guidelines. Often, guidelines are influenced by industries that profit from the diseases afflicting the public. This creates a conflict of interest, leading to a lack of transparency and comprehensive information sharing. In the pursuit of profit, the complete picture of risks and benefits is sometimes obscured.
The power of the placebo and nocebo effects is another aspect that should be considered when educating patients about risks and benefits. These psychological effects are real and can significantly influence treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, patients must ultimately have the autonomy to make informed decisions about their health.
Empowering individuals to take charge of their health through informed consent doesn’t mean we should assume they will make “wrong” choices or be too lazy to change their habits. Instead, it recognizes that when patients are fully aware of the consequences of their choices, they are better equipped to make decisions aligned with their values and goals.
I am also not necessarily blaming providers for following the standard of care. I recognize the limited resources, and the desire for efficiency and recommending what’s best for the patient at any given time. However, when we rush, there is more of a chance for people to fall through the cracks (I am talking about non-urgent care here; when it comes to emergencies – the Western system has no parallel).
Having experienced medical trauma myself, I believe we need to slow down for our treatment cascade, and really help meet patients exactly where they are. It’s a systemic issue and we need to solve it on a systemic level, including reassessing treatment guidelines. If we start treating people at the climax of their illness, we are too late. We are practicing “sick care” and not “health care”.
A crucial step toward improving informed consent is placing a stronger emphasis on patient education. Healthcare providers should prioritize clear, unbiased information that helps patients understand the complete spectrum of potential outcomes, including both benefits and risks. Patients should be encouraged to ask questions and engage in open dialogue with their healthcare professionals.
I, for one, believe it’s time for a paradigm shift in the Western allopathic medical system. If we do not uphold the principle of informed consent, we are not respecting the autonomy and dignity of each patient.
Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their health, based on comprehensive information. We need to address the conflict of interest between profit-driven industries and healthcare, prioritize unbiased education, and empower individuals to be active participants in their healthcare journey.
It will take intentional effort to build a healthcare system that truly prioritizes the well-being of every individual… and it’s a journey worth embarking upon.
